This pre-feasibility study develops a practical and implementable program to develop the Sarawak (Malaysia)–West Kalimantan (Indonesia) border area (within a broad geographic context), based on specific industry value chains. It identifies concrete and high-impact projects that will advance implementation of an integrated border area development program for West Kalimantan. It maps the optimal configuration of Sarawak–West Kalimantan cross-border trade and investment in goods and services; and, concurrently, provides the design of a border area development plan for the two territories. As a pre-feasibility study, we examine a wide range of industry options and determine which projects are economically viable within the socioeconomic, institutional, and political context of Sarawak and West Kalimantan. We follow the same analytical approach as that for the pilot project study of North Kalimantan and Sabah, which serves as a high-profile demonstration pre-feasibility study for this and other border area development programs.

This report updates a scoping study that was carried out by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in 2014 on the development of a border economic area between Malaysia and Thailand. Following that report, the two governments decided to initially focus on the border economic area (BEA) in the Malaysian state of Kadah and the Thai province of Songkhla since it handles the largest volume of cross-border movement of goods and people.

The present report updates development since 2014 in that area.The project builds on the IMT-GT connectivity corridors that serve as the channel through which development is to disseminate to areas throughout the sub-region. Impact of economic area along Malaysia-Thailand border is expected to link to Indonesia through connectivity to other corridors and serve as a sub-regional-level model for IMT-GT.

For a video on the project, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpgpN8Y2dYk&feature=youtu.be.

This study examines potential investment opportunities for cross-border value chains in the economic corridors of the Brunei Darussalam-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA).

It offers an investment perspective that is grounded on extensive interviews with company representatives and public sector officials. Qualitative and quantitative-based surveys were conducted over a six-week period by the study team that interviewed 70 companies distributed over 20 industry classifications or divisions in six BIMP-EAGA corridor states and provinces. The surveys were carried out through one-on-one interviews with company representatives and the results were used to rate not only investment opportunities in different industries, but also soft and hard infrastructural conditions that affect the investment climate.

This study examines the investment climate impacting on decisions to invest in the economic corridors of the Brunei Darussalam-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA). The key factors identified by businesses as impacting on their investment decisions in BIMP-EAGA’s corridors are complementarities in cross-border production activities and services, investment incentives, hard and soft infrastructure, the regulatory environment, governance, and other issues affecting cross-border investments.

The present study explores opportunities and challenges for intra- and inter-regional trade in the Central and South Asia areas by analyzing a wide range of channels impacting trade. Trade enhancing channels are divided into two broad categories. The first set refers to disaggregated or product-level characterizations of trade affecting competitiveness and complementarities between trading partners within and between the regions. The second refers to price, non-price and structural determinants that tend to affect all products traded between countries. The analysis also includes a gravity model to gauge the effect of economic growth, distance and price, non-price and structural determinants of regional trade.

The report provides a review and analysis of the findings from the scoping study on the proposed Malaysian–Thailand Special Border Economic Zone (SBEZ). The coverage of the study is guided by the recommendations of the IMT-GT Special Implementation Task Force on the Establishment of a Special Border Economic Zone (hereafter TF-SBEZ) at its meeting in Penang, Malaysia on 22 November 2013. At that time, the TF-SBEZ determined that that present study should be a stand-alone study, comprehensive in nature and cover in-depth all the SBEZ components for each of the eight border crossing areas in the Thai-Malaysian border, including linkages to Indonesia.

Based on those findings, the TF-SBEZ requested that the present study make recommendations to the Task Force on the possible location(s) of the SBEZ. The study is part of a broader project that intends to support the establishment of an SBEZ that will help to attract investors in productive activities that promote subregional value chains in order to stimulate cross-border trade and investment, serve as a catalyst to commerce along the IMT-GT corridors and help to substantially improve the social and economic welfare of the population along the border provinces.

China is the second most important export destination of Laos, and export growth to that market has far outpaced exports to Thailand, the leading export destination. One of the major drivers of this growth is the comprehensive ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) under which Lao benefits in trade of goods and services and in investment measures.

The ACFTA has a separate list for products on the normal and sensitive tracks. The Most Favored Nation (MFN) tariffs for products on the normal track are being progressively eliminated by 2015 on about 90% of all products. For the remaining products, tariffs are being eliminated based on a schedule for products on a so-called Sensitive List and another one called the Highly Sensitive List covering rice, sugar, plant oils, among others.

This guide shows how to determine (a) whether there are benefits to using ACFTA, and (b) whether a particular product being exported from Laos is eligible for a preferential rate. It is important to check these two conditions to avoid spending time and money in applying for the preferential rate if a product is already subject to a low customs duty outside ACFTA.

This study develops and operationalises a results framework for the overall GMS Core Agriculture and Support Program Phase II (CASP-II) with linkages to a result framework for each project within the program’s ongoing and proposed pipeline. It is intended to serve three purposes: first, to ensure that the priority projects have clear goals and a logical sequence of how the goals will be achieved; second, to serve as a monitoring and evaluation mechanism of the overall and project-specific results to be achieved; and, third, to help communicate expectations about the CASP-II strategy and accomplishments among GMS partner countries, development partners and other stakeholders

Successful implementation among 4 large farmer groups of value chain mapping and clustering of organic vegetables along East-West Economic Corridor of Greater Mekong Subregion.

This report describes four clusters for organic vegetables along the East West Economic Corridor (EWEC). These clusters have three goals: (a) to foster the conversion of conventional agricultural farming to organic production, and thereby enable the generation of high value-added activities; (b) to promote linkages among micro and small scale producers, and thereby improve their competitive position within the value chain; and (c) to spur the development of agricultural activities affecting the majority of the EWEC population either directly or indirectly, and thereby enable the transformation of the EWEC transport and logistics corridor into a full-fledged economic corridor. The report builds on an earlier study that mapped EWEC value chains for organic vegetables.

A "one-size-fits-all" approach to clustering of organic vegetable activities along the Corridor is neither feasible or practical. Our approach has therefore been to design each cluster in terms of the specific characteristics of their producers, markets and support systems. We have based the characterization of the clusters on three criteria: (1) stage of product development, since clusters differ in terms of their products coverage (e.g., fresh vegetables versus packaged products versus processed products) or types of services (e.g., organic farm-stays and eco-tourism); (2) stage of market development, since the rate at which cluster develop is determined by the use of technologies, certifications, branding, packaging, marketing and logistics; and (3) stages of public-private sector support, since the rate of cluster development often depends on the availability of support systems and these systems vary across areas along the corridor.